MI MI331

 
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Clinched Highway Mapping Forum Index -> Old topics
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Master son



Joined: 30 Dec 2008
Posts: 60
Location: SW Wisconsin

PostPosted: Wed Jun 25, 2014 7:04 pm    Post subject: MI MI331 Reply with quote

This route is an unsigned route but is marked by Google Maps.

Chris Bessert has included a "Rationalization" essay that includes the fate of many Michigan highways in the system including this one. for this particular one the rationale is

MDOT Kalamazoo Kalamazoo city M-331 South Kalamazoo City Limit to Michigan Ave 3.346 1998 Currently unsigned
MDOT Kalamzoo Kalamazoo city M-331 Westnedge Ave to Michigan Ave 1.516 1998 Currently unsigned; forms a one-way pair with Westnedge

http://www.michiganhighways.org/indepth/juristrans_1998-2002.html has a cleaner version search "M-331"

NOTE: I used Wikipedia's references to find the M-DOT versions, but they were all dead links.
Back to top View user's profile Send private message
dfilpus



Joined: 14 Jul 2008
Posts: 717
Location: Chapel Hill NC

PostPosted: Wed Jun 25, 2014 8:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

A state route has to be signed to be included in CHM.
_________________
Dave Filpus
http://roadgeek.filpus.org/
Back to top View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Master son



Joined: 30 Dec 2008
Posts: 60
Location: SW Wisconsin

PostPosted: Wed Jun 25, 2014 9:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

dfilpus wrote:
A state route has to be signed to be included in CHM.
oh? Confused When did that get decided?

I guess this is a moot point then. Lock away.
Back to top View user's profile Send private message
rickmastfan67



Joined: 14 Jul 2008
Posts: 2031
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

PostPosted: Wed Jun 25, 2014 10:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Master son wrote:
dfilpus wrote:
A state route has to be signed to be included in CHM.
oh? Confused When did that get decided?

I guess this is a moot point then. Lock away.


This has been the case for all State Highways.
Back to top View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Master son



Joined: 30 Dec 2008
Posts: 60
Location: SW Wisconsin

PostPosted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 7:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

rickmastfan67 wrote:
Master son wrote:
dfilpus wrote:
A state route has to be signed to be included in CHM.
oh? Confused When did that get decided?

I guess this is a moot point then. Lock away.


This has been the case for all State Highways.

Oscar explained the reasoning which were valid (take Alaska's name vs number preferences or California's segmentation method for relinquishment of control but not pulling down signs as examples) and helped me to understand it. State route databases are harder to maintain compared to the Interstates since sources are not always there or reliable.
Back to top View user's profile Send private message
oscar_voss



Joined: 27 Jul 2008
Posts: 622
Location: Arlington VA

PostPosted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 8:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just to be clear, Alaska's issue is a lot of significant roads without route numbers at all. When we activate the new Alaska State Highways route set and other new sets still in development, they will include only numbered routes, with unnumbered routes left for another day (or year, or decade). Also, California's relinquishments issue (which we still need to resolve for that under-development state route set) will involve route segments that have been removed from the state highway system altogether, not just losing their route number signage.

Where the unsigned routes rule really comes in, is with states like Maryland and Hawaii where the state highway department assigns a route number to every little bit of pavement it maintains. Focusing on signed routes eliminates a lot of short, minor routes that usually are unimportant to non-local travelers (and apparently the highway departments think so too).
Back to top View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
dfilpus



Joined: 14 Jul 2008
Posts: 717
Location: Chapel Hill NC

PostPosted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 10:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Florida and Georgia assign a primary state highway designation to every mile of Interstate and US Highways, but the vast majority of those are unsigned. To keep the CHM data base from growing out of hand and becoming unsupportable, the requirement of state routes being signed was instituted to limit the system to state highways that drivers may actually know about.
_________________
Dave Filpus
http://roadgeek.filpus.org/
Back to top View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Clinched Highway Mapping Forum Index -> Old topics All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


2005 Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group

Free Web Hosting | File Hosting | Photo Gallery | Matrimonial


Powered by PhpBB.BizHat.com, setup your forum now!
For Support, visit Forums.BizHat.com