OR I-5

 
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Clinched Highway Mapping Forum Index -> Old topics
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Bickendan



Joined: 29 Jul 2008
Posts: 1018
Location: Portland, OR

PostPosted: Fri Jul 24, 2009 3:22 am    Post subject: OR I-5 Reply with quote

Exit 27 has been relocated to a new interchange about half-mile south. The new interchange officially opened on the 16th, and the old one closed the 17th.

Exit 71 is being repositioned. It somehow got a quarter mile west from the highway...
Exit 76A is being renamed to 76_N.
Exit 189A -> 189_N.

In Portland, four missing interchanges (295_N Taylors Ferry Rd, 296B Multnomah Blvd [296A, Barbur Blvd/Spring Garden Ave, has been slightly repositioned and relabeled from 296], 302C Greeley Ave, 306_N Denver Ave) have been added, and two have been repositioned (299A and B) to better reflect the tangle of ramps and overlapping exits along I-405 in the Ross Island Interchange.
Of note, 302C will appear before 302B in the file, as 302B is at the center of the north I-5/405 stack, while 302C exits just before the stack's center point. 306_N is a southbound only exit (northbound onramp) for Denver Ave, just north of 306B (Delta Park).

Shape points are being added to the file, as there is a difference of 5 miles between the actual highway (308) and what the on-site stats report (303).
Back to top View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
yakra



Joined: 30 Jul 2008
Posts: 2600
Location: Area Code 207

PostPosted: Fri Jul 24, 2009 2:51 pm    Post subject: Re: OR I-5 Reply with quote

Bickendan wrote:
Exit 76A is being renamed to 76_N.
Exit 189A -> 189_N.
There's precedent for this nomenclature; ME I-295 8A is the first that comes to my mind. There's more, in CT, and... where else, TX?

Would 302C be necessary if it fits within the 302B footprint?
Back to top View user's profile Send private message
Bickendan



Joined: 29 Jul 2008
Posts: 1018
Location: Portland, OR

PostPosted: Sat Jul 25, 2009 1:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'd agree with you and revert the x_N tags to xA's, but that'd foul up exit 306
306A
306B
306_N (southbound side) Confused

Revert the others, leave 306 as the exception?

As for exit 302C... um... I'd have to clean up a number of CA's SR freeway files because I was very thorough. Technically, 302C does fit in the 302B footprint, but that would imply then that US 30 has access to the ramps when it doesn't.
Back to top View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
admin
Site Admin


Joined: 13 Jul 2008
Posts: 4053
Location: Maryland

PostPosted: Sat Jul 25, 2009 2:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Like Eric says, use the A suffix style. No need to change 76A etc. There are no "_N"'s etc. in the exit number labels.

For 306, just keep 306A and 306B, then add 306 for Denver Ave. Or move 306B to account for that whole interchange instead of two half interchanges.

302B & C should have the same point 302B.

In general, don't get carried away with lots of points for lots of tangled ramps. A single point for the whole 302B/C tangle is much simpler and still effective.
Back to top View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Clinched Highway Mapping Forum Index -> Old topics All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


2005 Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group

Free Web Hosting | File Hosting | Photo Gallery | Matrimonial


Powered by PhpBB.BizHat.com, setup your forum now!
For Support, visit Forums.BizHat.com