Important Notice:
We regret to inform you that our free phpBB forum hosting service will be discontinued by the end of June 30, 2024.
If you wish to migrate to our paid hosting service, please contact billing@hostonnet.com.
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
terescoj
Joined: 27 Aug 2008
Posts: 617
Location: Amsterdam, NY
|
 Posted: Tue May 14, 2013 10:58 pm Post subject: NY: Future I-86 |
 |
|
While addressing a datacheck error, I noticed that a new segment of freeway has opened on NY 17 since it and I-86 Future were drafted (http://www.recordonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20110921/NEWS/109210324). It looks like I-86FutMon and I-86FutCat can now be combined into a single route, connected by the new segment near Parksville.
I think this means I-86FutMon should be extended to include the new segment plus all of I-86FutCat, with I-86FutCat going away. But with an appropriate AltRouteNames entry so as not to break .list files. Sound correct?
Both NY17 and I-86FutMon will need some point repositionings and possibly some improved shaping as well. |
|
| Back to top |
   |
 |
yakra
Joined: 30 Jul 2008
Posts: 2600
Location: Area Code 207
|
| Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 1:50 pm Post subject: Re: NY: Future I-86 |
|
|
| terescoj wrote: | | I think this means I-86FutMon should be extended to include the new segment plus all of I-86FutCat, with I-86FutCat going away. But with an appropriate AltRouteNames entry so as not to break .list files. Sound correct? |
Sounds right to me. A little further kibitzing, since I have both I-86FutMon & I-86FutCat clinched, but not the new segment:
Move I-86FutCat *OldNY17 a bit northwest to where the Yahoo trace diverges from the Mapnik trace.
I-86FutMon also needs an *OldNY17 point here, which puts shaping within tolerance.
That means the *OldNY17 labels will need some kind of suffix to differentiate them.
You may want to allow for more *Old17 or *Old17_Foo labels being added in as other I-86 & I-86Fut segments are eventually joined together. For example, *Old17_W & *Old17_E could conflict with *Old17_W & *Old17_E in I-86FutZzy when they're joined.
Sorta like having I-610(8A) instead of I-610 in TX I-69Sug |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
2005 Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
