View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
yakra
Joined: 30 Jul 2008 Posts: 2600 Location: Area Code 207
|
Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2009 4:05 pm Post subject: CA state Fwy notes |
|
|
There's an extra point, 26.
Last edited by yakra on Thu Apr 02, 2009 7:53 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bickendan
Joined: 29 Jul 2008 Posts: 1018 Location: Portland, OR
|
Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2009 4:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Noted.
That point will be deleted; I-80(70) will be renamed as 26.
I-80's Exit 70 will be shifted southwest slightly to line up with the CA 113 mainlines and synchronized on both files. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
yakra
Joined: 30 Jul 2008 Posts: 2600 Location: Area Code 207
|
Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2009 4:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Also just noticed: check out the E end of CA160Sac. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bickendan
Joined: 29 Jul 2008 Posts: 1018 Location: Portland, OR
|
Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2009 5:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
... Are you referring to the exit sequence
47B
I-80bus_sac(9B)
48? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
yakra
Joined: 30 Jul 2008 Posts: 2600 Location: Area Code 207
|
Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2009 7:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes. I've been going over the CA routes for a while to update my LIST before sending in an update - and am now looking at this a second time, While I've been busy scrutinizing the routes, Tim's been busy updating - I-80bus_sac(9B) & 48 were previously much closer together.
With the way the ramps are set up here, I'd be inclined to combine these points together into one point - with the added bonus of a text-o-rama label interrupting a nice numeric series.
Another note: Should CA121Nap be included if <5 mi and entirely redundant with CA29SHH?
But do what thou wilt, it is after all your state. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bickendan
Joined: 29 Jul 2008 Posts: 1018 Location: Portland, OR
|
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2009 12:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, the exit configuration for CA 160 was deliberate, as the ramps for Exit 48 extend past the merge with Bus I-80 (and I moved the Bus I-80 point to synchronize). I had Exit 48 past the merge just for complete 'accuracy'.
I do see the argument for removing Exit 48/combining it with the Bus I-80 merge.
As far as CA 121 Nap, I don't see much of an issue whether it's there or not. I'd note it in my travels were I to go there, just because I'm a stickler for accuracy (barring Louisiana's SRs x.x). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
yakra
Joined: 30 Jul 2008 Posts: 2600 Location: Area Code 207
|
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2009 1:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
<grin> - In Califfornia, a multiplex is actually noteworthy! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|