View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
the_spui_ninja
Joined: 21 Oct 2013 Posts: 36
|
Posted: Mon Oct 28, 2013 4:08 pm Post subject: Miscellaneous SD info |
|
|
Some more updates...
SD highways 134, 139, 153, 203, 231, 248, 253, 314, and 445 are all unsigned or decomissioned. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jeff Morrison
Joined: 03 Aug 2008 Posts: 620
|
Posted: Wed Oct 30, 2013 1:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well, I am in favor of including them, because they are still state highways.
However, if there are no exceptions to the "no unsigned routes" rule, I guess they will have to come down. Tim?
Also, if I do have to delete them, can those designations stay intact in other routelogs or do I have to change those too? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
vespertine
Joined: 19 May 2012 Posts: 115 Location: Michigan
|
Posted: Tue Nov 05, 2013 7:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm not so sure about SD253 being unsigned/decommissioned. As of July 2013, signs were posted, and a brief search of SD laws shows the SD253 route is still on the books.
Leaving other highway types like interstates and US bannered routes aside, my impression was that if a state highway was on the books, but not signed, it would not be included in the database (like KY414 near Henderson, KY). That said, it feels wrong to take routes out of the database that are actually coded into law like South Dakota's.
v. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
the_spui_ninja
Joined: 21 Oct 2013 Posts: 36
|
Posted: Thu Nov 07, 2013 12:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
It's unsigned, not decommissioned. I just didn't want to have two lists. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
2005 Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|