AASHTO SCOH USRN May 2013

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Clinched Highway Mapping Forum Index -> 6-Month Outlook
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
dfilpus



Joined: 14 Jul 2008
Posts: 717
Location: Chapel Hill NC

PostPosted: Thu May 09, 2013 7:34 pm    Post subject: AASHTO SCOH USRN May 2013 Reply with quote

The actions from this meeting have been posted at:

http://route.transportation.org/Documents/Report%20to%20SCOH%20from%20USRN%20SM2013%20May%203-May%207.pdf

According the thread on AARoads, USRN rejected the Texas applications for I-2 and I-69C, but SCOH overruled them and the AASHTO board agreed.

Interstate changes approved were I-495 in NC, I-2 and I-69E in TX and I-90 BL in WA.
_________________
Dave Filpus
http://roadgeek.filpus.org/
Back to top View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
rickmastfan67



Joined: 14 Jul 2008
Posts: 2031
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

PostPosted: Thu May 09, 2013 8:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Any PDF maps of the changes posted yet? For some odd reason, I'm blocked from their site and have to use a proxy to get to it.
Back to top View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
admin
Site Admin


Joined: 13 Jul 2008
Posts: 4053
Location: Maryland

PostPosted: Thu May 09, 2013 9:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here's the link to 377 pages of applications.

http://route.transportation.org/Documents/Binder-all%20applications%20May%202013.pdf
Back to top View user's profile Send private message
yakra



Joined: 30 Jul 2008
Posts: 2600
Location: Area Code 207

PostPosted: Fri May 10, 2013 2:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Once again, Kansas says "Hey AASHTO! We're twinning a US Route in place! Isn't that keen!"
Also: replacing an at-grade multiplex split with an interchange.

Texas:
* I'll just hand-wave the I-69E stuff till there's reports of it being signed in the field. I'm sure it will not take the AARoads crowd long at all, once it exists.
* The US 67/377 entry describes the first I-69 Robstown segment that's already been in the HB since April 2012. Yeah, okay...
* US 67 Business: TXDOT appears to be jumping the gun again. They also got bypasses/business routes approved in Cresson and Mount Pleasant, before there's even any evidence of construction having begun.
Back to top View user's profile Send private message
oscar_voss



Joined: 27 Jul 2008
Posts: 622
Location: Arlington VA

PostPosted: Fri May 10, 2013 6:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Don't forget the new I-2 along the TX/MX border, as well as I-69C. Those will also catch the AARoads crowd's attention, to the extent any of them wander that far south.
Back to top View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
admin
Site Admin


Joined: 13 Jul 2008
Posts: 4053
Location: Maryland

PostPosted: Fri May 10, 2013 8:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Does anyone know more about the story behind the rejection--oops,nah---approval of the suffixed I-69 routes?
Back to top View user's profile Send private message
si404



Joined: 07 Oct 2009
Posts: 708

PostPosted: Fri May 10, 2013 11:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

admin wrote:
Does anyone know more about the story behind the rejection--oops,nah---approval of the suffixed I-69 routes?
The AASHTO Committee's rejection (based on their no new suffixed routes) was overturned by the SCOH.

Quite why they also did the same with I-2 beats me - it isn't a suffixed route!
Back to top View user's profile Send private message
deanej



Joined: 29 Jul 2010
Posts: 103

PostPosted: Sun May 12, 2013 8:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I can understand why one would reject I-2 (it's only 46 miles long), but it doesn't fit under the reason mentioned there.
Back to top View user's profile Send private message
Jeff Morrison



Joined: 03 Aug 2008
Posts: 620

PostPosted: Thu May 16, 2013 1:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

North Carolina wants an even-numbered spur from I-95 to Raleigh and doesn't want to change I-540, which is/will be a loop.

Texas wants suffixed I-69 routes and AASHTO's objection was overruled.

Completely bass-ackwards.
Back to top View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Clinched Highway Mapping Forum Index -> 6-Month Outlook All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


2005 Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group

Free Web Hosting | File Hosting | Photo Gallery | Matrimonial


Powered by PhpBB.BizHat.com, setup your forum now!
For Support, visit Forums.BizHat.com