| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
admin
Site Admin
Joined: 13 Jul 2008
Posts: 4053
Location: Maryland
|
|
| Back to top |
  |
 |
Jeff Morrison
Joined: 03 Aug 2008
Posts: 620
|
 Posted: Tue May 15, 2012 2:29 am Post subject: |
 |
|
In the case of "twinning" roads - that is, two lanes next to the existing two lanes without otherwise changing the alignment - do we need to go through and reset the points so they are in the new median, or will the existing points suffice?
I see the listing for US 67, which now has been four-laned from Fredericktown to Poplar Bluff, and I think there is a mix of that and new alignment that MUST result in making new points.
I may need to wait for the files to become available, or I'll see if the county maps are updated. I'm not sure I can go with Google at this point as its satellite photos are a mix age-wise and it's putting shields on about every alignment 67 has had.
This also brings up the "how anal-retentive are we" debate in regards to clinching...but that is another thread.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
admin
Site Admin
Joined: 13 Jul 2008
Posts: 4053
Location: Maryland
|
| Posted: Wed May 16, 2012 11:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| In the typical twinning-in-place case, there's probably too little gain in adjusting waypoint locations if they remain within the whole roadway. I can think of better uses of collaborator time. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
yakra
Joined: 30 Jul 2008
Posts: 2600
Location: Area Code 207
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
