| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
mapcat
Joined: 08 Oct 2011
Posts: 150
Location: United States
|
 Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 9:57 am Post subject: Future I-73 & I-74 in SC |
 |
|
| I drove both highways end to end and saw no evidence of them being future interstates. I realize that they are supposed to be designated I-73 and I-74 at some point, but it seems that other future interstates listed in the HB have "Future" shields posted, or some other evidence in the field. |
|
| Back to top |
  |
 |
rickmastfan67
Joined: 14 Jul 2008
Posts: 2031
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 11:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There is precedent for this happening.
With I-295 in Florida, we had the 'Future' segment here on the site, even though there was no 'proof' posted in the field that it would become I-295 someday and it was just posted as FL-9A.
It's up to Tim if he wants to remove them from the site. I'd personally say them them stay, but that's just me. |
|
| Back to top |
 |
|
yakra
Joined: 30 Jul 2008
Posts: 2600
Location: Area Code 207
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2014 10:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Is AR I-130FutTex a similar case? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
si404
Joined: 07 Oct 2009
Posts: 708
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2014 1:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I'm guessing these are AASHTO-approved segments? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
rickmastfan67
Joined: 14 Jul 2008
Posts: 2031
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2014 7:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| si404 wrote: | | I'm guessing these are AASHTO-approved segments? |
I-295 wasn't as far as I know till it was ready to be posted.
As for I-73/74, that's a congressional approved one. I only added what was already Interstate grade in those SC files. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
