| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
yakra
Joined: 30 Jul 2008
Posts: 2600
Location: Area Code 207
|
 Posted: Mon Jun 03, 2013 11:51 am Post subject: South Dakota, mostly Sioux Falls |
 |
|
SD I-90BSWhi:
I-90_W -> I-90
Sioux Falls:
SD I-29BSSio:
I-90BL -> I-90BS
multiplex with SD42 broken
SD I-90BSSio:
multiplex with SD115 broken
Should SD42 label get trumped by I-29BS?
The multiplexes only need the 42/115 point repositioned.
I-229BLSio's multiplexes are fine, so you can use its coords in the above 2 files. |
|
| Back to top |
  |
 |
Jeff Morrison
Joined: 03 Aug 2008
Posts: 620
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 16, 2013 1:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
I left the business interstate designations off at the downtown intersection because I thought it would be easier for the user if I only identified the route that goes THROUGH the intersection rather than ending or turning at it.
As for "broken", two coordinates for the intersection are used in the various files. It just happened. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jeff Morrison
Joined: 03 Aug 2008
Posts: 620
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 30, 2013 3:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| These should be changed for the HB. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
