| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
froggie
Joined: 14 Jul 2008
Posts: 848
Location: Norfolk, VA (when not out to sea)
|
 Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 6:18 am Post subject: |
 |
|
I'd wait on I-22 as A) it wasn't designated "regular" Interstate then switched to "Future", and B) it doesn't connect to anything yet.
_________________
Froggie
http://www.ajfroggie.com |
|
| Back to top |
   |
 |
rickmastfan67
Joined: 14 Jul 2008
Posts: 2031
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 1:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
FYI Tim, the links aren't working for the Future I-73/I-540 pages yet. Seems like you forgot to upload them.
EDIT: Now both routes are missing from my NC page as of the Nov 2nd update. |
|
| Back to top |
 |
|
admin
Site Admin
Joined: 13 Jul 2008
Posts: 4053
Location: Maryland
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 2:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
| They're intentionally gone for now. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
rickmastfan67
Joined: 14 Jul 2008
Posts: 2031
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 2:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
| admin wrote: | | They're intentionally gone for now. |
Then maybe you might want to mention something about that on the Update page.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
froggie
Joined: 14 Jul 2008
Posts: 848
Location: Norfolk, VA (when not out to sea)
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 7:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Tim, I'd have left them on, for two reasons: A) avoid confusion (as you've already cause confusion with James by removing them), and B) wait pending what FHWA decides. Remember that FHWA and *NOT* AASHTO is the final deciding factor on Interstates, and I'd hazard a bet that FHWA will at least keep I-540 as a full Interstate.
_________________
Froggie
http://www.ajfroggie.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
admin
Site Admin
Joined: 13 Jul 2008
Posts: 4053
Location: Maryland
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 11:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
| You're probably right about FHWA. When will FHWA decide? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
froggie
Joined: 14 Jul 2008
Posts: 848
Location: Norfolk, VA (when not out to sea)
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 6:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, theoretically, they already have, as FHWA would have had to sign off on the construction plans for both.
_________________
Froggie
http://www.ajfroggie.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
admin
Site Admin
Joined: 13 Jul 2008
Posts: 4053
Location: Maryland
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 11:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I-73_N and the longer I-540 are back as soon as the upload finishes.
I-40 gobbles up I-40BL now too. I'm using the old I-40 exit numbers, which should soon be the new exit numbers.
For I-73, I've seen the list of new exit numbers but will hold off on them until I get word that they are posted. Then I'll duplicate all the points  and hide the I-40-based ones. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
rickmastfan67
Joined: 14 Jul 2008
Posts: 2031
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
admin
Site Admin
Joined: 13 Jul 2008
Posts: 4053
Location: Maryland
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
