NY: I-99
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Clinched Highway Mapping Forum Index -> Old topics
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
rickmastfan67



Joined: 14 Jul 2008
Posts: 2031
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

PostPosted: Sat Jun 28, 2014 2:37 am    Post subject: NY: I-99 Reply with quote

Looks like it's now official in NY as of 6/27.

Not sure if shields are up yet or not.

http://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?topic=12778
http://www.stargazette.com/article/20140627/NEWS01/306270011/Corning-now-has-2-interstates-U-S-15-designated-99-Pa-border
Back to top View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
terescoj



Joined: 27 Aug 2008
Posts: 617
Location: Amsterdam, NY

PostPosted: Sat Jul 05, 2014 12:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

In addition to taking ny.i099futman and making it ny.i099, I need to update a couple of labels on NY 417 (US15_S and US15_N) for this. Also, am I correct that I should replace all of US 15's labels with I-99(x) names since its NY segment is entirely concurrent with I-99 now?
Back to top View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
rickmastfan67



Joined: 14 Jul 2008
Posts: 2031
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

PostPosted: Sat Jul 05, 2014 10:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

terescoj wrote:
Also, am I correct that I should replace all of US 15's labels with I-99(x) names since its NY segment is entirely concurrent with I-99 now?


Yep.

Now we just wait for the shields to show up.
Back to top View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
terescoj



Joined: 27 Aug 2008
Posts: 617
Location: Amsterdam, NY

PostPosted: Sun Jul 06, 2014 4:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

With Interstates, we post them as soon as they're official, even if unsigned, correct?
Back to top View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
rickmastfan67



Joined: 14 Jul 2008
Posts: 2031
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

PostPosted: Mon Jul 07, 2014 2:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

terescoj wrote:
With Interstates, we post them as soon as they're official, even if unsigned, correct?


No, since Tim didn't allow me to add I-69 in TN, even though it was approved, but not signed. He only allowed me to add it as a 'Future' highway.
Back to top View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
terescoj



Joined: 27 Aug 2008
Posts: 617
Location: Amsterdam, NY

PostPosted: Mon Jul 07, 2014 10:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

OK, then I'll hold off until we get reports of signs in the field.
Back to top View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
dfilpus



Joined: 14 Jul 2008
Posts: 717
Location: Chapel Hill NC

PostPosted: Mon Jul 07, 2014 11:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Same thing here in North Carolina. We hold off signing new segments of Interstates being converted from Future Interstates until they're actually signed in the field.
_________________
Dave Filpus
http://roadgeek.filpus.org/
Back to top View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
yakra



Joined: 30 Jul 2008
Posts: 2600
Location: Area Code 207

PostPosted: Mon Jul 07, 2014 2:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I guess then that CA I-305, MD I-595, ME I-495 etc. are considered a slightly different beast from these...
Back to top View user's profile Send private message
dfilpus



Joined: 14 Jul 2008
Posts: 717
Location: Chapel Hill NC

PostPosted: Mon Jul 07, 2014 3:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

yakra wrote:
I guess then that CA I-305, MD I-595, ME I-495 etc. are considered a slightly different beast from these...

Those are Interstates that are permanently left unsigned by the particular state DOT's.
I-99, I-69, I-73, I-74, I-49 are interstates still under development.
There is a segment of I-73 north of I-40 that is complete and officially part of the Interstate System, but the DOT has left signing that segment part of the project to build the next segment of I-73. There is an End I-73 Shield at I-40. If we were to include that segment on the end of I-73, driving the route would pass the End sign and continue for the next few exits. The next project has been let for construction. In a couple of years, the next project will be complete and I-73 will be signed along that segment and we will extend the route.
_________________
Dave Filpus
http://roadgeek.filpus.org/
Back to top View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
oscar_voss



Joined: 27 Jul 2008
Posts: 622
Location: Arlington VA

PostPosted: Mon Jul 21, 2014 12:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I-99 signs are up in several places on NY's part of US 15. I drove it midday yesterday (Sunday 7/20), on my way back home from Rochester.

I'll post more details, and photos, on the aaroads.com forum (with a link here to that post), once I get some sleep.
Back to top View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
rickmastfan67



Joined: 14 Jul 2008
Posts: 2031
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

PostPosted: Mon Jul 21, 2014 12:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sounds good Oscar. Can't wait to see the pictures myself! (Any State Named shields? Razz hehe.)
Back to top View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
oscar_voss



Joined: 27 Jul 2008
Posts: 622
Location: Arlington VA

PostPosted: Mon Jul 21, 2014 3:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here's my post on the aaroads forum with some of the photos I shot yesterday.

No state names on the I-99 markers. But the last photo in that post, of an End I-99 marker with a Pennsylvania welcome sign in the background, confirms that it's a New York marker.
Back to top View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
terescoj



Joined: 27 Aug 2008
Posts: 617
Location: Amsterdam, NY

PostPosted: Mon Aug 18, 2014 5:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Now that it's signed, I'd like to get this in. I think this is what needs to happen:

ny.i099futman gets deleted, along with its entry in usaif's csv files.

ny.i099 gets created, along with its entry in usai's csv files. Question here: what becomes of the *'ed points?

ny.us015 gets waypoints renumbered with I-99(x) labels as appropriate.

ny.ny417 gets labels for I-99 interchanges replaced with I-99(x) labels as appropriate. Old names remain as hidden alternates.

Anything else?
Back to top View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
yakra



Joined: 30 Jul 2008
Posts: 2600
Location: Area Code 207

PostPosted: Mon Aug 18, 2014 6:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

terescoj wrote:
Question here: what becomes of the *'ed points?
I believe these would stay in.
Back to top View user's profile Send private message
rickmastfan67



Joined: 14 Jul 2008
Posts: 2031
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

PostPosted: Tue Aug 19, 2014 12:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

yakra wrote:
terescoj wrote:
Question here: what becomes of the *'ed points?
I believe these would stay in.


I think they should stay in too for I-99. There is a prior case similar to this on I-99 in PA for the temporary exit @ Skytop when it wasn't an Interstate yet.
Back to top View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Clinched Highway Mapping Forum Index -> Old topics All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


2005 Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group

Free Web Hosting | File Hosting | Photo Gallery | Matrimonial


Powered by PhpBB.BizHat.com, setup your forum now!
For Support, visit Forums.BizHat.com