| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
ntallyn
Joined: 09 Sep 2008
Posts: 150
|
 Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2012 11:25 pm Post subject: OK: OK33, OK51, OK95, OK132, OK136 |
 |
|
On OK 33, I believe waypoints US270_W and US270_E should also indicate US281.
On OK51, waypoints US60_E and US270_E on OK51 suffer from the same issue, and waypoint US64_W is missing US412.
On OK95, waypoints US64_W and US64_E are also missing US412.
On OK132, waypoints US60_W and US60_E are also missing US412.
On OK 136, waypoint US64_W is missing US412.
Nick |
|
| Back to top |
  |
 |
mwasleski
Joined: 20 Aug 2009
Posts: 191
Location: Kansas City, MO
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 11:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm not sure how consistent we've been with this, but generally we try to include only the primary (or lowest numbered) highway on a concurrent label such as these. Otherwise the labels get longer, and therefore more prone to errors. The preference is to keep the labels as short as possible while still identifying the intersection, which these do.
-Mike |
|
| Back to top |
 |
|
admin
Site Admin
Joined: 13 Jul 2008
Posts: 4053
Location: Maryland
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2013 11:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Mike, take another look at our labeling instructions. Nick's suggestions should indeed be done. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
yakra
Joined: 30 Jul 2008
Posts: 2600
Location: Area Code 207
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2015 1:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Taking another look at our labeling instructions, they say that "Two numbered highways may appear in a waypoint", not "shall", "must", etc.
I'm thus declaring this ticket closed, and locking this thread. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
2005 Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
